The progressive state of architecture [be it Malaysian or the world as a whole], as well as that of the many other forms of human disciplines such as literature, interior design or interior architecture, or fashion is so complex that one will normally do not always manage to differentiate its intricacies using clear and meaningful criteria. Some architectural critics have the opinion that architectural styles in many cities within the Asia-pacific region or perhaps to be specific in
“Zaman sudah berubah, dunia dah maju” as one favorite saying in an advertisement in our recent TV broadcasting media. As though, the ideal argument that “Architecture being a product of climate, social customs or cultures, need not be identical between two countries within a region” has since been slowly fading away from every individual’s confused understanding. Like it or not, everyone has to participate in the evaluation of global network, both real and electromagnetic. We are all as it seems to be now, more or less only a keytap away from each other. This widespread of ‘persamaan’ or togetherness tends to encourage rapid and unavoidable translation of architectural styles from one community country to another. However, for many Architectural Critics if not all in consensus to agree, still had pointed out that: “local, specific and critically regional cultures still, paradoxically, bear relevance for us despite the increasing dissolution of national boundaries”.
As for Malaysian architectural records [if any? or . . . . . of course there really are!] over the last decade also has reveals a huge variety of styles and trends, which has produced undeniable riches. I’m not trying to be smarty academic to give an analysis on the fate of the present Malaysian architecture as resultant to or with respect to the many unwelcoming or probably unapologetic international influences towards our general approach in reading our architecture: though in certain circumstances, in my own personal view, it has respectfully been more beneficial than destruction. My intention in this essay merely to express my gratitude to the one architectural style which worth exploring in the context of our own Malaysian climatic condition and requirements
One of the favourite styles that exist within the context of our present in fulfilling the demand of our climatic condition and requirements, is what most of us would agree to describe it as the Contemporary Tropical Regionalism style of architecture.




7 comments:
I attended a seminar on 'Modern Communities' organised by Archicenter and PAM last month.
The seminar was very interesting as we can see some major changes in our housing design.. Kampung Style environment.. a need for communal space, seperated walkway and road, climatic approach to building design, house that represents our culture etc..It shows people in Malaysia are starting to know the richness of architecture.. no more typical and conventional terrace house design ( that is straight and facing the road)
But sad to say that it's only meant for high income group. The social problem in low cost housing still hard to solve. Lack of communal space, small house, no social interaction and others..
I know it cost dollars and cents, but as an architect we should rethink and relook at the public housing design also.
Another thing is, I wonder why some people still like Roman Column..nak kata Empayar Rom pernah takluk Tanah Melayu ni tak jugak..hu..hu..hu..
Cakap pasal hubungan antara culture & architecture, saya teringat masa zaman belajar dulu buat 'measured drawing' sebuah rumah bujang Terengganu kat Besut. Pemiliknya bernama Norhaiza Nordin, seorang tukang ukir tersohor kat Besut yang minatnya suka kumpul rumah-rumah Melayu lama dan reconstruct balik ( lebih kurang macam usaha Arkitek Raja Bahrin kat Aryani Resort ).
Dengar dia cerita, naik semangat saya bila cerita dunia seni Melayu (senibina dan seniukir).Alangkah hebatnya orang dulu-dulu buat tanpa pelan dan alat pertukangan yang canggih. Setiap yang direka seolah-olah ada roh dan pengertian di sebaliknya. Kalau dilihat dari sudut praktikal, rumah Melayu dulu-dulu melambangkan budaya, status dan respon kepada cuaca setempat.
Sayangnya senibina Melayu dah makin terhakis kerana maaf kalau saya katakan masyarakat kita lebih tercondong kepada idea senibina Bali atau contemporary. Sebenarnya kita masih ada identiti senibina Melayu ( Rumah Bujang Terengganu, Rumah kelantan, Rumah Kedah dan lain-lain). Cuma ia mungkin sukar diterapkan kerana tukang-tukang yang pakar dalam bidang ni dah berkurangan. So masyarakat cedok sahaja elemen-elemen yang dah nampak terlalu komersial seperti Balinese Style.
Harap kita dapat fikirkan bagaimana nak hidupkan balik senibina Melayu yang sebenarnya..
Shamsul!
Saya sangat2 setuju dengan cadangan you tu. We have the role as architect to MEMPERKASAKAN SENIBINA MELAYU kita. Generasi muda macam you diperlukan. Go for it SYABAS.
p.s: arkrab akan cuba buat sesuatu kearah itu, insayaAllah. Mungkin perjalanannya masih jauh.
nama pun orang dulu ..masa tu man maju lagi
malaysia web design
orang dulu2 power
fire fighting traning
orang dulu2 banyak makan akar kayau asli
malaysia web design
Post a Comment